Comment on the National Science Ed Framework Draft

July 14, 2010 at 9:39 PM Leave a comment

The national standards in development may well supercede state science standards with the Race to the Top funding, when they are fully completed. The standards dictate the texts and the tests and that’s what forms the backbone of the received science curriculum. Don’t get me started on the debacle around the standards in California. The national standards are our best hope to have genuinely ‘world class’ standards in the United States.

And thank goodness so far, they look ever so much more coherent than the Ca Science Standards, with the role of process as important as concepts, and a strong emphasis on application and engineering too. They are interesting and not overwhelming to read. Prof. Helen Quinn of Stanford has been a stalwart advocate of authentic, inquiry science here in California and is now chairing this initiative. Thank you, Helen.

Take some time out of this glorious summer to give your input on this vital document. What do you like? What is over- or under-emphasized? What’s missing? Share your comments here too. Let’s work up some steam on this together!

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Policy. Tags: , .

Creativity in the News “Mindset” – change ours, change theirs…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Categories

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 393 other followers


%d bloggers like this: